Just Keep Runnin'

May 18, 2024

Recent EntriesHomeJoin Fast Running Blog Community!PredictorHealthy RecipesJason McK's RacesFind BlogsMileage BoardTop Ten Excuses for Missing a RunTop Ten Training MistakesDiscussion ForumRace Reports Send A Private MessageWeek ViewMonth ViewYear View
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2008200920102011
15% off for Fast Running Blog members at St. George Running Center!

Location:

Logan,UT,USA

Member Since:

Jul 01, 2008

Gender:

Male

Goal Type:

Boston Qualifier

Running Accomplishments:

  • 9 Marathons (3:00:38 TOU 9-10)
  • 4 Halfs (1:23:55.7 TOU 8-10)
  • 4 5ks (20:18 1st Dam 11-08)

Short-Term Running Goals:

Build up to regular weeks of 70 miles.

Qualify for Boston at TOU 2010! (3:10:59)


Long-Term Running Goals:

BQ

Stay Healthy

Complete at least 1 marathon / year until I die.

Personal:

Married with 4 beautiful daughters

Wife

Favorite Blogs:

Click to donate
to Ukraine's Armed Forces
Miles:This week: 0.00 Month: 0.00 Year: 0.00
Barefoot! Lifetime Miles: 67.68
Vibram 5-Finger KSO Br Lifetime Miles: 459.01
NB MR790 BrOr Lifetime Miles: 1151.08
NB MT-100 Lifetime Miles: 505.33
NB MR790 BRed Lifetime Miles: 751.42
NB MR790 BRed 2 Lifetime Miles: 335.71
Inov-8 Roctite 320 Lifetime Miles: 247.46
AirWalk Clogs 1 ($15) Lifetime Miles: 55.51
Total Distance
11.20

AM  I'm trying a new training philosophy.  Normally on Tuesday I have run 9.0 miles at 7:15 pace.   I'm following the program at the following URL - http://www.runnersworld.com/article/0,7120,s6-238-244-255-9215-0,00.html  I guess that other than 2 key workouts, I should be training at 70% of Max Heart Rate.  Today's pace was 8:08.  That means the 9 miles that I normally do took me 8 minutes longer this week, plus I added another 2.2 miles - so I spent 1:31 on the road instead of 1:05.

This seems a little slow and I'm not sure if the training program means 70% of max, like it says, or if it means 70% of Heart Rate Reserve.  My Max is 196, my min is around 45.  70% of 196 is 137.  70% of Heart Rate Reserve is 151. I tried to keep my HR around 150 and tried not to get over 159.  There is one large hill (out and back) - on the way back I hit 164 and running down the hill I hit 163.  Hills give me trouble.  I know that I am supposed to give a level effort, but I always push hard on hills, so it was a lot of work holding back.  I almost felt like I could walk faster.

I guess that my pace was better than my last marathon, so I shouldn't feel like it was extremely slow, but again, it was work to hold back so much.

 

PM  Basketball 1.5 hrs.

Weight: 0.00
Comments
From Sasha Pachev on Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 17:39:55

My thoughts on that program. The reason it works on elites is that they already have years of base mileage when they start the program. The name of the program is a misnomer. What is actually happening is not "build speed, then endurance". It is "use the existing endurance, work on speed, then continue to improve the endurance". A runner without a life-time aerobic base will not be able to do the workouts at the intensity needed to improve his speed. He will only fatigue himself and risk injury.

In your case - your half is 1:30, your full marathon is 3:34. That is a clear indicator of the lack of base conditioning. I would recommend working on that without distractions. 6 days a week, no less than 8 miles on each run. Do not worry about the pace - run whatever feels natural even if it is slow. The most important thing is that the next day you feel good enough to run the same mileage again without a risk of injury or overtraining. Race or run time-trials once every couple of weeks to see where you are at. You should be seeing improvements in distances as short as a 5 K.

From Jason McK on Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 18:41:08

When I joined this blog, I was hoping that I could get information from someone with as much experience as yourself. Thanks for responding. My average heart rate for all the training I've done in the last 5 months is 168 (my max HR is 196, min is 50). Should I slow down, or continue at that pace? I just want to make sure that I'm doing the optimal training, not just the right amount of miles. What do you think?

From Sasha Pachev on Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 18:55:46

Your body knows how fast you should run better than your HRM. Go with your intuition. It should feel relaxed. You should be able to maintain a conversation. Your legs should not be hurting the next day after the run. When in doubt, err on the side of slow.

A warning sign that a training pace is too fast for aerobic conditioning in being unable to maintain a slightly faster pace in a race. E.g if you race a half in 1:30 and are not in better shape, 7:30 pace for an aerobic run is too fast. But at the same time, if you pick up to 6:15 and feel you can hold it forever after running a couple of miles, then 7:30 might be OK.

Having said that, continue to use your HRM and pay attention at how fast you have to run to reach a certain heart rate and how it changes from day to day. But never use it as a pacing guide - see the top ten list of training mistakes link at the top of this page.

From Jason McK on Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 19:37:18

Thanks again for the responses, this is the help that I need. I use my heart rate monitor more to check (after a run) how I did. During the past 5 months, other than races, my daily averages were between 158 and 177. While training for my first marathon, the treadmills at the gym had HR monitors, so I wore my chest strap and noticed that 169 bpm was where I usually was during my long runs at 8:00 miles. Since May, all of my training has been outside and I run faster off the treadmill.

As far as pain goes, I've really only had sore muscles after the two marathons. I feel virtually no affects the day after any run. I ran the TOU half at 1:30:03 and didn't know how long I could maintain that pace (my HR average was 178) but felt just fine the next day. I guess that is anaerobic and I didn't know I could only maintain my HR that high for 16 miles...

Should my training ever focus in the anaerobic state? Does training in the aerobic state prepare you better for racing in an anaerobic state?

By the way, good luck at SGM!

From Sasha Pachev on Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 16:46:42

When you run a race longer than 100 meters, you always have the aerobic and the anaerobic component. The longer the race, the bigger role the aerobic component plays. The marathon is 98% aerobic. The 10 K is 90%. You can see the chart at

http://www.gillathletics.com/articles/news021302.htm

for other distances.

As you can see, a race longer than 2 miles is always at least 70% aerobic.

The good news is that your aerobic system is very responsive to training, and it does not take a rocket scientist to know how to train it - just go out and run every day at a comfortable pace. The key is consistency.

From Jason McK on Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 18:40:29

OK, so aerobic is the focus. Then I shouldn't worry about attempting to go longer in an anaerobic state?

So when you run, do you use a heart rate monitor? During a marathon, what is your heart rate compared to your maximum HR?

Add Your Comment.
  • Keep it family-safe. No vulgar or profane language. To discourage anonymous comments of cowardly nature, your IP address will be logged and posted next to your comment.
  • Do not respond to another person's comment out of context. If he made the original comment on another page/blog entry, go to that entry and respond there.
  • If all you want to do is contact the blogger and your comment is not connected with this entry and has no relevance to others, send a private message instead.
Only registered users with public blogs are allowed to post comments. Log in with your username and password or create an account and set up a blog.
Debt Reduction Calculator
Featured Announcements
Lone Faithfuls
(need a comment):
Recent Comments: